The M4 Mantra - "Making Medicine More Mobile"

Thursday, April 23, 2009  | Peter J. Haigh, FHIMSS


Author - Peter J. Haigh, FHIMSS, Tele-Mobile Healthcare

Healthcare diagnosis and treatment in the USA is very much a “Mahomet must go to the mountain (1)” kind of business; the onus is on the patient to do whatever is takes transport themselves to the provider’s location.  Huge progress has been through medical research and equipment invention, yet the model for how these are used has remained almost unchanged for decades   Telemedicine, Home Health visits and the long abandoned Doctor’s “House calls” represent only very minor “exceptions to the rule.”  Would it save time and money if patient transport was restricted to occasions when an in-person consultation or special medical resources were really needed?  Could it be valuable if specialist advice was obtainable by means more effective than a phone call or a page? 

Some have been thinking and talking about this for several years, myself included.  Now more people are beginning to believe in the possibility, thanks to communications and other technologies developed for other purposes, but which look like they will allow for change in how healthcare is treated in the same way as the rest of the economy and society in general has changed.  We bank over the Internet, buy merchandise the same way, and of course we communicate increasingly via phones and other devices which are inherently mobile.  When and how will the business we call Healthcare harness this flexibility and convenience?  My crystal ball is a little cloudy, (largely because I’m a technologist with knowledge of healthcare, not a medical practitioner with knowledge of technology) but I see signs (and dream dreams) that “the times they are a changing ... (2).”

What do I see?  I see TeleStroke (3) and STRokeDOC (4) using the power and flexibility of 3rd generation cellular data networks to connect apparent stroke victims with radiologists and .neurologists who can communicate and study brain images to collaborate on diagnosis and determine things like whether to prescribe TPA within the short timeframe in which it’s effective, even though the medical specialist and patients are all physically remote from each other.  I hear about the transmission of vital signs and diagnostic images of patients while they are en route by ambulance to an emergency room (5) so that “the golden hour” (or its equivalent for their condition) is put to best use in starting or preparing for their treatment.  I’ve personally contributed to the creation of M3, a multi-year trial enabling clinicians to diagnose and order treatment when they are “wherever they are”, better yet to receive alarms when their urgent attention is needed, using a fully functional PC with all the IT applications available to them that they would have at the ICU bedside.  I dream about remote physiological monitoring based on cellular telephony devices (phones, Smartphones, PDAs, etc.) which allow both the patient and the care-giver to be able to move around at will – and this dream is coming true.  The huge value proposition is that with cellular devices already owned by a high (and rapidly rising) percentage of the population, the significant cost of today’s monitoring systems can greatly reduced. 

How can we take even more advantage of the IT and telecom technologies used in the examples described above?  We need medical practitioners and healthcare providers of all kinds to “take of the blinders” and think about how they can take advantage of these technologies to transform the way they work, to make it more timely and efficient by removing the barriers of time and distance from diagnostic and treatment as it is provided today........  Just keep up the M4 mantra.........

    (1)  Francis Bacon, circa 1601 On Boldness “If the hill will not come to Mahomet, Mahomet will go to
           the Hill”, subsequently reworded.
    (2)  Bob Dylan, Copyright 1963
    (3)  http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/18338
    (4)  http://telestroke.massgeneral.org/default.aspx
    (5)  http://www.welchallyn.com/pressroom/releases/2007/2007-04-17.htm

 

Member Comments


Peter's comment "and this dream is coming true" in some respects reflects or work at the Telehealthcare Company Ltd. in UK where, in collaboration with The National Physical Laboratory and others we are combining the multiple monitoring and communication fuinctions of Ultrasound (Cardiac Function and Ejection Fraction) respiration, respiratory sounds, temperature, dry lead ECG, voice communication, excersize measurement and falls annalysis in a single microlelctronic intelligent wearable SmartPatch. It communicates via WIFI and/or cellular network cell phone to remote cares via the internet. The device, being ASIC- driven will cost around $31 compared to the $150,000 for an ultrsound machine and it weighs 12 grams. If there is any hospital or remote carer organisation executive reading this who would like to collaboarate in our field trials please get back to me. Alan.magill@telehealthcareco.com

alan magill

Chairman
The Telehealthcare Company Ltd.

 

Posted by: alan magill
4/24/2009

 

Thanks to Connected Health, KTwo have already take a step to realize this dream of healthcare on the go..

KTwo’s CytoSight a Telepathology Solution helps in making a difference and improving peoples life. This product is powered by Intel.

Do check the link http://www.ktwo.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=190

I can set up a remote demo for more discussions.

Regards,

Guru
-----------------------------------
Gurudev.R.Goud
Vice President-Business Development
KTwo Technology Solutions-“Last Metre Connectivity™ Solutions Company”
North Block, 1st Floor, Rajajinagar IT Park, Bangalore-560 044, India.
(+91)(80) 2314 4422 X 120|US-TollFree (+1) 866 248 9040|(+91)98866 93 861| |SkPe:ggurudev|(+91)(80) 2314 4411|guru@ktwo.co.in|www.ktwo.co.in

Gurudev Goud

VP-Business Development
KTwo Technology Solutions

 

Posted by: Gurudev Goud
4/28/2009

 

I agree with Peter Haigh's comments above. I am a practicing hospitalist physician and welcome any movement towards hand-held technology. Every practitioner has a hand held device/cell phone. However, they may not be utilizing all of the device's capabilities. Hence...No further financial investment needed!

I think that the first step at removing the blinders from practitioners is identifying key practitioners in the field that are aware of some technologies in telehealth/mHealth and educating them more. Empower those providers so that they can give peer-to-peer education to those practitioners that are technology-shy.

A good example I like to use is the use case for an interventional cardiologist. Explain that the emergency room can perform an ECG on a patient with chest pain, scan it in color with high resolution to a .pdf format, and email it to the physician for review on his cell phone while he is at dinner at a restaurant. Now, the interventional cardiologist no longer needs to be near a fax machine or a computer to view a 12-lead ECG when deciding whether or not to call in the cath lab team or not.

This could be duplicated to practitioners with regards to chest xrays, etc. Programs currently exist that allow patient labs to be downloaded live to cell phones but require a manual refresh. This is amazing. Yet I never hear anyone speak about this technology. Is this because it is cost prohibitive?

I welcome your input!!

Making Medicine More Mobile!!

Jonathan S. Ware, MD
jware@drwareonline.com

Jonathan Ware

President
PacketGreen

 

Posted by: Jonathan Ware
4/28/2009

 

Welcmome to M4 Dr. Ware. I see that we are very much on the same page. I'm pleased to know that some physicians are leading the way, but we need more willing to practice "modern mobile medicine". The patient results application needing a manual refresh - surely this has to be a "feature" of the way the application was (incorrectly) designed. It is perfectly feasible to implement an application which "pushes" results to a clinician's mobile device whenever the results are obtained - or whenever they lie outside a previously set up range that indicates no intervention required - in other words an "alarm" when something my be needed and peace for the clinicain otherwise. M M M M indeed!!!! Peter

Peter Haigh

Pres
TMHS

 

Posted by: Peter Haigh
5/4/2009

 

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

Harvesting the fruits of "Connected" for healthcare
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | Joseph Ternullo, JD, MPH  | 1 Comment
mHealth for All
Monday, January 18, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
Evaluating Connected Health Interventions
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 | Adam Kaufman, PhD  | 3 Comments
Thoughts on Symposium 2009 via Twitter
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Look Ahead to the Future of Online Health
Monday, October 12, 2009 | Mark Bard  | 3 Comments
Health Systems Implementation - Advice for getting it done right - the voice of experience
Monday, September 21, 2009 | Theodore Blizzard, MBA, MSHI and Anne Burgess, BSN, MSHI  | 2 Comments
Clinical Groupware: It's time for modular EHR technology
Friday, August 21, 2009 | David C. Kibbe, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health Goes Mainstream: What is our competition?
Thursday, July 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Riding the Bus or Taking the Wheel - The Telemonitoring Choice
Friday, June 19, 2009 | Kathy Duckett, BSN, RN  | 2 Comments
Game-Care Revolution: A Healthcare Game Changer?
Friday, May 15, 2009 | Jeff Brown  | 5 Comments
The M4 Mantra - "Making Medicine More Mobile"
Thursday, April 23, 2009 | Peter J. Haigh, FHIMSS  | 4 Comments
Why Online Care?
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | Roy Schoenberg, MD, MPH  | 3 Comments
$19 Billion Investment in Networked Electronic Records? Where do we Plug In?
Friday, February 20, 2009 | Philip Marshall, MD, MPH  | 5 Comments
As we look ahead...Advancing the field of Connected Health
Friday, January 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Health Care Reform…The Missing Piece
Monday, December 22, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 29 Comments
LifeCOMM: Will the Newest Personal Health Information Platform Play Nicely with Google and Microsoft?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | Vince Kuraitis
The Financial Meltdown: Implications for Connected Health
Friday, October 17, 2008 | Thomas H. Lee, MD  | 7 Comments
The Art and Science of Inspiring Quality in Clinical Medicine
Friday, September 26, 2008 | Jeff Gruen, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health: Expanding its Role to Prevent 30-day Hospital Readmissions
Friday, August 22, 2008 | Allison McDonough, MD  | 5 Comments
Solving the Puzzle of Poor Adherence – Can Connected Health Tools Provide the Missing Pieces?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 | Shanta Griffin, PhD and Alice Watson, MD, MPH  | 7 Comments
Can Connected Health survive the political economy of health care?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | Matthew Holt  | 3 Comments
Connected Health and the Medical Home: Savior or Distraction?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 6 Comments
Connected Health in the Developing World
Monday, March 24, 2008 | Paul Heinzelmann  | 15 Comments
Can Second Life serve as a virtual training ground for individuals with poor social skills?
Monday, February 25, 2008 | Dr. Jerome Schultz  | 9 Comments
How Reliable is Reliable in Connected Health?
Monday, January 21, 2008 | Doug McClure  | 9 Comments
Self-Insured Companies: Low-Hanging Fruit for Consumer-Driven Telehealth?
Monday, November 26, 2007 | Malcolm Burwell  | 3 Comments
What Will Microsoft's HealthVault Mean to the Telehealth Community?
Thursday, October 18, 2007 | Vince Kuraitis and Tim Gee  | 6 Comments
Causing What Isn’t
Monday, August 20, 2007 | Joseph Kvedar  | 2 Comments
Revolutionizing Healthcare
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 | Jeff Gruen  | 6 Comments
Personal Health Management
Monday, May 21, 2007 | Joseph Ternullo  | 3 Comments
Medical Education of the Future?
Friday, April 27, 2007 | Ramesh Ramloll  | 2 Comments
Using Telemedicine to Create Intimacy
Monday, April 9, 2007 | Jon Darsee  | 12 Comments
Can we use Web 2.0 in Health Care?
Friday, December 8, 2006 | Sally Lakeman  | 11 Comments
The Changing Care Provider
Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Ateret Haselkorn  | 4 Comments
A Metric for Connected Health Success?
Friday, October 6, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 9 Comments
Impediments to Technology Adoption
Monday, September 25, 2006 | Neil Wasserman  | 5 Comments
Behavioral Telehealth
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 | Steven Locke  | 5 Comments
Will MediPare Come to Pass?
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 | Ashok Boghani  | 14 Comments
A Home Care Perspective
Friday, May 5, 2006 | Kathy Duckett  | 4 Comments
The True Burden of Connected Health?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | Ravi Nemana  | 7 Comments
The Future of the Hospital
Friday, March 17, 2006 | Joseph Coughlin  | 6 Comments
The Role of Consumer Grade Techologies
Sunday, January 8, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 7 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go