Significant Impact Does Not Require Significant Technology

Wednesday, July 14, 2010  | Paul Robichaux


About the Author:  Paul Robichaux is an IT consultant.

I’m a 28 year old IT consultant married to a dermatology resident.  In the past, our professional lives rarely crossed; but this all changed when she opted to do a year of research during medical school at The Center for Connected Health (CCH).  During her year of research, I was constantly fascinated by how technology was being used to improve patient outcomes and increase people’s access to quality healthcare, and the ingenuity of new healthcare products such as Vitality’s Internet connected pill bottle cap.  I was particularly interested in how underserved communities can benefit from readily available technologies, such as an EMR.  As a result, my fascination turned into a mini project which came to fruition this past April.  As an inspiration to my interest in Healthcare IT, I wanted to share with the CCH community the outcome and vision of my mini project.

Last year, my wife, Venessa, and I decided to do a voluntourism  trip in April to a remote Fijian clinic, The Mission at Natuvu Creek.  Venessa would assist the resident doctor with seeing patients in the clinic and I, with the buzz of CCH’s Connected Health Symposium still fresh in my mind, decided to try implementing an EMR.  This was something that was within my technical capabilities and would have the added benefit of saving time and allow them more reporting options.  I decided on a design which would allow them to go completely paperless: a centrally located EMR published over a wi-fi network, accessed using multiple laptops.  However, like any project, I encountered both financial and technical setbacks which didn’t allow me to follow this plan.  Instead, I would assess the clinic’s operations once we arrived and build and implement what made sense; knowing that this trip might end up only being exploratory.

After spending the first week of the trip getting familiar with their daily processes, I started building their EMR—it would essentially be a copy of their existing paper record with additional support to track specific diagnosis.  With only one laptop, the paper system would still be required with the information entered into the computer after the visit.

Even though the EMR did not get implemented until our last day at the clinic, its impact was immediately noticed.  Before, all their records were filed alphabetically.  Now patients are be given a patient number and filed accordingly, reducing the time spent at the end of the day filing records.  In addition, finding files immediately became more efficient.  To locate the patient number they could query a patient based on any number of fields, including first name, last name or village.  These efficiencies are so simple and expected that I had taken them for granted during my initial plan of implementing a complex system.  Recently I sent the clinic an update to the system which allows them to create monthly reports breaking down patients by village, diagnosis, and number of patients each doctor has seen; a process normally done by hand and tallied daily—now it is done in seconds.  This is valuable information that can be used by the clinic to justify donations as well as promote the clinic to doctors in medical fields showing the most need.

Venessa and I see this accomplishment as the first step to bringing truly “connected” health to a population in need of specialized care.  Our goal is to setup a real-time teledermatology service in the clinic in which Venessa and others can help diagnosis patients.    The remoteness of the clinic has the added benefit of helping a population in desperate need of specialized care, however, at the same time presents unique challenges to achieving this goal.  The lack of high speed Internet and costly equipment required for real-time teledermatology in addition to a large time difference must be overcome.  In the meantime, the next step towards achieving this goal is to arrange a store-and-forward process in which the resident doctor can fill-out a form in the EMR specific to dermatology, attach pictures, and within the application, email to a listserv of dermatologists. 

Since learning about CCH, I’ve been introduced to some of the newest applications of technology in healthcare.  At first, I was intimidated when I set out, afraid I wouldn’t be able to have the impact that others have made on improving patient care.  However, my experience proved that even the simplest technology can have a significant impact.  Hopefully, that impact will grow with each improvement we make.

 

Member Comments


Post a comment.

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

Furthermore… Evolving Thoughts on Evaluating Connected Health Interventions
Friday, August 20, 2010 | Adam Kaufman, PhD  | 1 Comment
Significant Impact Does Not Require Significant Technology
Wednesday, July 14, 2010 | Paul Robichaux
The Uncertain Price of mHealth
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
Take the Fear Out of Patient-Connected Health
Friday, April 23, 2010 | Trisha Torrey  | 1 Comment
Social Networking and Connected Health
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Harvesting the fruits of "Connected" for healthcare
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | Joseph Ternullo, JD, MPH  | 1 Comment
mHealth for All
Monday, January 18, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
Evaluating Connected Health Interventions
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 | Adam Kaufman, PhD  | 3 Comments
Thoughts on Symposium 2009 via Twitter
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Look Ahead to the Future of Online Health
Monday, October 12, 2009 | Mark Bard  | 3 Comments
Health Systems Implementation - Advice for getting it done right - the voice of experience
Monday, September 21, 2009 | Theodore Blizzard, MBA, MSHI and Anne Burgess, BSN, MSHI  | 2 Comments
Clinical Groupware: It's time for modular EHR technology
Friday, August 21, 2009 | David C. Kibbe, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health Goes Mainstream: What is our competition?
Thursday, July 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Riding the Bus or Taking the Wheel - The Telemonitoring Choice
Friday, June 19, 2009 | Kathy Duckett, BSN, RN  | 2 Comments
Game-Care Revolution: A Healthcare Game Changer?
Friday, May 15, 2009 | Jeff Brown  | 5 Comments
The M4 Mantra - "Making Medicine More Mobile"
Thursday, April 23, 2009 | Peter J. Haigh, FHIMSS  | 4 Comments
Why Online Care?
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | Roy Schoenberg, MD, MPH  | 3 Comments
$19 Billion Investment in Networked Electronic Records? Where do we Plug In?
Friday, February 20, 2009 | Philip Marshall, MD, MPH  | 5 Comments
As we look ahead...Advancing the field of Connected Health
Friday, January 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Health Care Reform…The Missing Piece
Monday, December 22, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 29 Comments
LifeCOMM: Will the Newest Personal Health Information Platform Play Nicely with Google and Microsoft?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | Vince Kuraitis
The Financial Meltdown: Implications for Connected Health
Friday, October 17, 2008 | Thomas H. Lee, MD  | 7 Comments
The Art and Science of Inspiring Quality in Clinical Medicine
Friday, September 26, 2008 | Jeff Gruen, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health: Expanding its Role to Prevent 30-day Hospital Readmissions
Friday, August 22, 2008 | Allison McDonough, MD  | 5 Comments
Solving the Puzzle of Poor Adherence – Can Connected Health Tools Provide the Missing Pieces?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 | Shanta Griffin, PhD and Alice Watson, MD, MPH  | 7 Comments
Can Connected Health survive the political economy of health care?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | Matthew Holt  | 3 Comments
Connected Health and the Medical Home: Savior or Distraction?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 6 Comments
Connected Health in the Developing World
Monday, March 24, 2008 | Paul Heinzelmann  | 15 Comments
Can Second Life serve as a virtual training ground for individuals with poor social skills?
Monday, February 25, 2008 | Dr. Jerome Schultz  | 9 Comments
How Reliable is Reliable in Connected Health?
Monday, January 21, 2008 | Doug McClure  | 9 Comments
Self-Insured Companies: Low-Hanging Fruit for Consumer-Driven Telehealth?
Monday, November 26, 2007 | Malcolm Burwell  | 3 Comments
What Will Microsoft's HealthVault Mean to the Telehealth Community?
Thursday, October 18, 2007 | Vince Kuraitis and Tim Gee  | 6 Comments
Causing What Isn’t
Monday, August 20, 2007 | Joseph Kvedar  | 2 Comments
Revolutionizing Healthcare
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 | Jeff Gruen  | 6 Comments
Personal Health Management
Monday, May 21, 2007 | Joseph Ternullo  | 3 Comments
Medical Education of the Future?
Friday, April 27, 2007 | Ramesh Ramloll  | 2 Comments
Using Telemedicine to Create Intimacy
Monday, April 9, 2007 | Jon Darsee  | 12 Comments
Can we use Web 2.0 in Health Care?
Friday, December 8, 2006 | Sally Lakeman  | 11 Comments
The Changing Care Provider
Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Ateret Haselkorn  | 4 Comments
A Metric for Connected Health Success?
Friday, October 6, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 9 Comments
Impediments to Technology Adoption
Monday, September 25, 2006 | Neil Wasserman  | 5 Comments
Behavioral Telehealth
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 | Steven Locke  | 5 Comments
Will MediPare Come to Pass?
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 | Ashok Boghani  | 14 Comments
A Home Care Perspective
Friday, May 5, 2006 | Kathy Duckett  | 4 Comments
The True Burden of Connected Health?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | Ravi Nemana  | 7 Comments
The Future of the Hospital
Friday, March 17, 2006 | Joseph Coughlin  | 6 Comments
The Role of Consumer Grade Techologies
Sunday, January 8, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 7 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go