How Emerging Care Delivery Models Affect Connected Health

Tuesday, September 21, 2010  | Liz Boehm


About the Author: Liz Boehm is a Principal Analyst, Customer Experience for Healthcare & Life Sciences, at Forrester Research.


In the wake of health (insurance) reform and all the discussions regarding Accountable Care Organizations and Medical Home, I’ve been thinking a lot about care delivery mechanisms, connected health, and the complexities of rewarding both health practitioners and consumers for “good” health behavior.  Let me start by sharing a core belief:  We could all use a little health intervention.  By that I mean that in the battle between good intentions and bad behavior, the more support we have on our side, the better.  The question is, how do we put that health support together in a way that is appropriate, effective, and manageable in terms of costs?  I usually draw the picture this way:

Boehm image

By “Technology-mediated engagement,” I mean connected health platforms, Websites, medical devices, and the whole gamut of tech-based solutions that help measure and message about health.  By human-mediated engagement,” I mean nurse call centers, health coaches, social networks, community resources, and any institution or platform that links people in a one-to-one or one-to-many fashion for health improvement.

My first premise is that everybody belongs somewhere on the horizontal axis of this graphic.  Where each person belongs will depend on their health status, level of motivation, personal and insurance-based investment capacity, comfort with technology, health literacy, geographic location, and other psycho-social factors.

My second premise is that the line between the technology-mediated and human-mediated engagement needs to be very blurry.  We already see some of this happening in the work of the Center for Connected Health that marries tech-based monitoring with human-based reporting and coaching.  I strongly believe this is the way of the future for connected health.

So what about reimbursement, accountable care organizations, and patient-centered medical home?  I had a briefing a couple of months ago from a company called Qliance, which is advocating for and delivering concierge medicine for the masses.  They believe that it doesn’t make sense to insure primary care because it is frequent, predictable, and has low variable costs.  Insurance, they say, should be reserved for things that are infrequent, unpredictable, and high-cost.  Their model delivers all primary care (including core disease management for conditions like diabetes and heart conditions) for an age-based sliding-scale fee that is significantly lower than the average insurance premium.  Even more interesting, they are working with insurance companies to wrap high-deductible catastrophic coverage plans around their services that ultimately deliver better out-of-pocket protection for a lower monthly premium than the average plan that includes primary care coverage.

The reason I bring this up in the context of connected health is that this model doesn’t discriminate against care delivered in-person versus via email or video-conference or even via connected devices.  There is no financial disincentive, only an unfettered desire to serve patients well so that they will stay with the practice and consume the level of practice resources that are appropriate to their care needs.  And with smaller panels and no need to pack patients in to meet revenue targets, doctors, nurses, and other care professionals can take the time to educate patients on the diet, lifestyle, and device  adaptations they need to make to stay healthy, as well as monitoring data and progress over time.

As health reform plays out, and we see increased pressure on the care delivery system to conform to the constraints imposed by financing mechanisms, I see an opportunity for the connected health community to augment and reinforce the delivery models that truly put the patient at the center.  Not simply by constructing a model that we call “accountable” or “patient-centered,” but by bringing patient needs and patient data to the forefront.

 

Member Comments


Very insightful, Liz, especially the diagram. We're finding that the workflow of office visits is so ingrained that unless one completely does away with fee-for-service it is difficult to completely free the care model from in person care.

Joseph Kvedar

Director
Center for Connected Health

Joseph C. Kvedar, M.D., is the Founder and Director of the Center for Connected Health, applying communications technology and online resources to increase access and improve the delivery of quality medical services and patient care. Dr. Kvedar is also a board-certified dermatologist and Vice-Chair of Dermatology at Harvard Medical School. In his role with the Center for Connected Health, Dr. Kvedar launched the first physician-to-physician online consultation service in an academic setting. He is also leading important research into novel approaches for connected health in a variety of medical specialties, including post-operative care in the home, wound care, and remote monitoring of patients with chronic diseases. Dr. Kvedar is a past President and member of the governing Board of the American Telemedicine Association (ATA). Dr. Kvedar is also Chair of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Task Force on Telemedicine. Dr. Kvedar is internationally recognized for his leadership and vision in the field of connected health and the application of communications technologies to improve healthcare to patients. Dr. Kvedar is co-editor of a new book, Home Telehealth, which was published in May 2006. He is a frequent lecturer and has authored over 60 publications on telemedicine and connected health. In 2003, Dr. Kvedar was honored by the New England Business and Technology Association for his extraordinary leadership in the field.

 

Posted by: Joseph Kvedar
9/23/2010

 

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

What do Patients Really Want?
Thursday, February 23, 2012 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Reflections on the mHealth Summit
Monday, December 19, 2011 | Rob Havasy
A Few of Our Favorite Twitter Questions & Comments from Symposium 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011 | Jennifer Priester
Quality and Efficiency at the 2011 Connected Health Symposium
Friday, September 30, 2011 | Joseph Kvedar, MD
FDA’s Proposed Mobile App Regulations – The Fog Lifts
Friday, July 22, 2011 | Rob Havasy  | 2 Comments
Crossing The Digital Divide with Connected Health
Thursday, June 16, 2011 | Joseph Kvedar, MD
Technology as an Enabler
Tuesday, March 29, 2011 | Fariba Rahbary, Pharm.D.
Challenges of Connected Health Interoperability
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 | Rob Havasy  | 8 Comments
Game Changer? A Simple Download Capability
Tuesday, November 30, 2010 | Carol Diamond, MD, MPH
A Few of Our Favorite Twitter Questions & Comments from Symposium 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010 | Jennifer Priester
How Emerging Care Delivery Models Affect Connected Health
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 | Liz Boehm  | 1 Comment
Furthermore… Evolving Thoughts on Evaluating Connected Health Interventions
Friday, August 20, 2010 | Adam Kaufman, PhD  | 1 Comment
Significant Impact Does Not Require Significant Technology
Wednesday, July 14, 2010 | Paul Robichaux
The Uncertain Price of mHealth
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 4 Comments
Take the Fear Out of Patient-Connected Health
Friday, April 23, 2010 | Trisha Torrey  | 1 Comment
Social Networking and Connected Health
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Harvesting the fruits of "Connected" for healthcare
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | Joseph Ternullo, JD, MPH  | 1 Comment
mHealth for All
Monday, January 18, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go