Health Systems Implementation - Advice for getting it done right - the voice of experience

Monday, September 21, 2009  | Theodore Blizzard, MBA, MSHI and Anne Burgess, BSN, MSHI


About the Authors:  Theodore Blizzard, MBA, MSHI is Vice President and Chief Information Officer for the Mass Medical Society and New England Journal of Medicine. Anne Burgess, BSN, MSHI is Clinical Database Program Manager, Cardiac Surgery, at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Ted Blizzard is also a speaker and co-chair for the 2009 Connected Health Symposium - Oct 21-22.


Imminently, healthcare organizations will be facing important decisions regarding implementation of electronic medical records systems. These systems offer enormous benefits and demonstrate improved patient care and outcomes. Based on past experience, many systems will fail to meet clinician expectations. Some systems will be implemented only partially, while others will outright be rejected. How can clinical and technical professionals ensure the most favorable outcome during this challenging and exciting time?

We had the privilege of sitting down with some of the most experienced technology leaders in the country. They have literally decades of experience and understand what it takes to effectively implement healthcare systems. We asked a series of questions to identify important characteristics for successful implementation.  In this brief article, we will provide a summary of some of their advice and ask you to participate in providing your own input.

1. Start with clearly articulated core objectives that are modest and achievable; build on that success.

2. Plan carefully and in short phases (three months or less); celebrate at major milestones.

3. Show completed work quickly and iterate design in real-time.

4. Develop common vocabulary (glossary) to facilitate usability and expedite development by utilizing those similar basic design elements.

5. Recruit, develop, and retain specialized personnel to minimize project risk. Cultivate leaders in your organization.  Give people the opportunity to grow.

6. External changes such as legislation and/or pay-for-performance requirements may result in project failure if there is a lack of awareness, response, or incorporation. It is critical to have detailed functional and technical specifications for each project phase. This allows teams to minimize scope creep within each phase but maintain flexibility for later phases, maximize opportunity to integrate new domain requirements and lessons learned.

7. Vendor contracts should specify use cases for each workflow design and be held accountable for such. Many contracts have open-ended design specifications, which may turn into “Change Requests”.  This could lead project demise due to budget constraints and/or clinician/project fatigue. Understanding which workflows need to be included in the final system product will also enable domain customization.

8. Interoperability between integrated systems should be defined in advance. Many systems fail because they cannot properly communicate with other mission-critical systems. Lack of interoperability is rarely sustainable, lacks efficiency, and can be costly.

9. Engaging a committed sponsor to provide continuity, minimize interference, and advocate success is described as critical. Senior leadership changes often cause disruptions at the project level. Different philosophies or management approaches can impose undo stress and should be mitigated against when possible.  

10. Training for the entire staff in EMR workflow is an important success criterion. Many implementation specialists focus training on clinical staff but may overlook administrative staff. The detailed project plans should specify appropriate stages for linking these teams together in order to train and solidify all user experiences.

It is important not to lose sight of the ultimate goal when implementing these complex systems. In the end electronic medical records should benefit patient care.  We hope these 10 summary items provide some tips for successful implementations and anticipate your suggestions as well.

We want to thank our colleagues who participated in our interviews including:
- Cole Dowaliby-Riley, MGPO, Corporate Manager, PHS IS, MGH
- Steven Flammini, Chief Technology Officer, Partners HealthCare
- Erica Hokenson-Salazar, Manager of Nursing Informatics/Advanced Clinicals, Caritas Norwood Hospital
- James Noga CIO, MGH
- Christine West, Practice Consultant, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative

 

Member Comments


Nice work - good points. This is relevant not only to EMR, but any clinical information system implementation.

Lisa Ewing

Project Manager
PHS/Partners Radiology

 

Posted by: Lisa Ewing
9/24/2009

 

Thanks you Lisa! We hope it helps people.

ted blizzard

VP/CIO
MMS/NEJM

 

Posted by: ted blizzard
10/1/2009

 

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

Significant Impact Does Not Require Significant Technology
Wednesday, July 14, 2010 | Paul Robichaux
The Uncertain Price of mHealth
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
Take the Fear Out of Patient-Connected Health
Friday, April 23, 2010 | Trisha Torrey  | 1 Comment
Social Networking and Connected Health
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Harvesting the fruits of "Connected" for healthcare
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | Joseph Ternullo, JD, MPH  | 1 Comment
mHealth for All
Monday, January 18, 2010 | Rob Havasy  | 3 Comments
Evaluating Connected Health Interventions
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 | Adam Kaufman, PhD  | 3 Comments
Thoughts on Symposium 2009 via Twitter
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Look Ahead to the Future of Online Health
Monday, October 12, 2009 | Mark Bard  | 3 Comments
Health Systems Implementation - Advice for getting it done right - the voice of experience
Monday, September 21, 2009 | Theodore Blizzard, MBA, MSHI and Anne Burgess, BSN, MSHI  | 2 Comments
Clinical Groupware: It's time for modular EHR technology
Friday, August 21, 2009 | David C. Kibbe, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health Goes Mainstream: What is our competition?
Thursday, July 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 4 Comments
Riding the Bus or Taking the Wheel - The Telemonitoring Choice
Friday, June 19, 2009 | Kathy Duckett, BSN, RN  | 2 Comments
Game-Care Revolution: A Healthcare Game Changer?
Friday, May 15, 2009 | Jeff Brown  | 5 Comments
The M4 Mantra - "Making Medicine More Mobile"
Thursday, April 23, 2009 | Peter J. Haigh, FHIMSS  | 4 Comments
Why Online Care?
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | Roy Schoenberg, MD, MPH  | 3 Comments
$19 Billion Investment in Networked Electronic Records? Where do we Plug In?
Friday, February 20, 2009 | Philip Marshall, MD, MPH  | 5 Comments
As we look ahead...Advancing the field of Connected Health
Friday, January 23, 2009 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 2 Comments
Health Care Reform…The Missing Piece
Monday, December 22, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 29 Comments
LifeCOMM: Will the Newest Personal Health Information Platform Play Nicely with Google and Microsoft?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | Vince Kuraitis
The Financial Meltdown: Implications for Connected Health
Friday, October 17, 2008 | Thomas H. Lee, MD  | 7 Comments
The Art and Science of Inspiring Quality in Clinical Medicine
Friday, September 26, 2008 | Jeff Gruen, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health: Expanding its Role to Prevent 30-day Hospital Readmissions
Friday, August 22, 2008 | Allison McDonough, MD  | 5 Comments
Solving the Puzzle of Poor Adherence – Can Connected Health Tools Provide the Missing Pieces?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 | Shanta Griffin, PhD and Alice Watson, MD, MPH  | 7 Comments
Can Connected Health survive the political economy of health care?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | Matthew Holt  | 3 Comments
Connected Health and the Medical Home: Savior or Distraction?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 6 Comments
Connected Health in the Developing World
Monday, March 24, 2008 | Paul Heinzelmann  | 15 Comments
Can Second Life serve as a virtual training ground for individuals with poor social skills?
Monday, February 25, 2008 | Dr. Jerome Schultz  | 9 Comments
How Reliable is Reliable in Connected Health?
Monday, January 21, 2008 | Doug McClure  | 9 Comments
Self-Insured Companies: Low-Hanging Fruit for Consumer-Driven Telehealth?
Monday, November 26, 2007 | Malcolm Burwell  | 3 Comments
What Will Microsoft's HealthVault Mean to the Telehealth Community?
Thursday, October 18, 2007 | Vince Kuraitis and Tim Gee  | 6 Comments
Causing What Isn’t
Monday, August 20, 2007 | Joseph Kvedar  | 2 Comments
Revolutionizing Healthcare
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 | Jeff Gruen  | 6 Comments
Personal Health Management
Monday, May 21, 2007 | Joseph Ternullo  | 3 Comments
Medical Education of the Future?
Friday, April 27, 2007 | Ramesh Ramloll  | 2 Comments
Using Telemedicine to Create Intimacy
Monday, April 9, 2007 | Jon Darsee  | 12 Comments
Can we use Web 2.0 in Health Care?
Friday, December 8, 2006 | Sally Lakeman  | 11 Comments
The Changing Care Provider
Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Ateret Haselkorn  | 4 Comments
A Metric for Connected Health Success?
Friday, October 6, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 9 Comments
Impediments to Technology Adoption
Monday, September 25, 2006 | Neil Wasserman  | 5 Comments
Behavioral Telehealth
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 | Steven Locke  | 5 Comments
Will MediPare Come to Pass?
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 | Ashok Boghani  | 14 Comments
A Home Care Perspective
Friday, May 5, 2006 | Kathy Duckett  | 4 Comments
The True Burden of Connected Health?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | Ravi Nemana  | 7 Comments
The Future of the Hospital
Friday, March 17, 2006 | Joseph Coughlin  | 6 Comments
The Role of Consumer Grade Techologies
Sunday, January 8, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 7 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go