Connected Health: Expanding its Role to Prevent 30-day Hospital Readmissions

Friday, August 22, 2008  | Allison McDonough, MD


About the author - Allison McDonough, MD is a physician at MGH Revere HealthCare Center, and Medical Director of Chronic Disease Management for Partners HealthCare.


Control of Medicare spending is an increasingly urgent goal for the U.S. healthcare system, and is the focus of many debates and pilot programs.  Decreasing the rate of readmission within a 30 day window has become a major focus in Washington, with potential to deny or limit Medicare payment for readmissions deemed avoidable.  Connected health can contribute significantly to preventing such readmissions by improving monitoring of patients after discharge. It is poised to provide additional benefit by assisting with access to timely ambulatory care for high risk patients, and could also play a role in medication reconciliation after discharge.

There is ample room for improvement in 30 day readmission rates.  In 2005, an average of 18% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of their hospital discharge, with a range of 14% at the 10th percentile to 21% at the 90th percentile (Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. health system performance, 2008). Medicare estimates that 13% of these readmissions were “potentially avoidable,” based on the IPPS rule, with major areas of concern including poor communication with patients at discharge, especially around medications, and inadequate post hospital discharge monitoring.  Prevention of these avoidable readmissions could save Medicare about $12 billion per year. (Report on Medicare Compliance, Volume 17, Number 24, June 30, 2008)

We now have the opportunity to develop robust and comprehensive programs to address these areas, and in the process create a system of more efficient, effective, safe, and patient focused care.  For the 9th Statement of Work for the Quality Improvement Organizations, CMS has incorporated care coordination targeting general hospital readmission rates for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia.  The National Quality Forum is expected to approve a measurement approach for preventable readmission soon, which will allow evaluation and public reporting by CMS.  Two bills have been submitted to committee in congress which, if enacted, would limit payment for preventable readmissions.

What needs can connected health address for recently hospitalized patients? 

Post Hospital Discharge Monitoring:  Remote daily measurement of vital signs and symptoms in the heart failure population has shown great promise already in reducing readmissions, through improved monitoring as well as patient education.  The effectiveness of telemonitoring in other populations should be explored. IT platforms which facilitate interactions with Primary Care Providers will enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of telemonitoring.  These interactions may also improve patients’ access to timely ambulatory care, avoiding Emergency Department visits and readmissions.  

Post Hospital Discharge Medication Reconciliation:  Improvement of discharge planning and followup has focused on providing inpatient discharge facilitators, improving discharge paperwork, and arranging post hospital discharge phone interventions for medication reconciliation, symptom review, and followup appointment reminders.  These have been shown to have significant effect in decreasing Medicare readmission rates.  Continued investigation into how best to structure telephonic interactions is needed.  Documentation of these encounters in the primary EMR will have tremendous potential to streamline and enhance this process.

Questions remain:  How can we expand telemonitoring to other disease populations, such as COPD, AMI?  How can we leverage existing programs and technologies to further assist with discharge education and medication reconciliation?  What is the best way to structure telephone based interventions for recently discharged patients? 

I look forward to hearing your perspectives.

 

Member Comments


I suggest referral of patients to home care agencies following discharge; this allows much of the follow-up to be done as suggested above and this care has been successful for many years and where the patient wishes to recover. It does require the cooperative efforts of the hospital, physician, home care agency and patient/family to be successful. Too often when you call a office after-hours the immediate instruction is for the individual to call 911. If patient has placed with an appropriate home care after hospital care discharge, those instructions should include call your home care agency or call 911. To reinvent new systems when there are alternatives already in place, seems an additional burden. Home Care has long advocated telemedicine as an additional aspect of care and it is used in a fair number of home care providers throughout the nation, not only to monitor vital signs, but to critically examine wounds, and to reinforce teaching to caregivers. Unfortunately, CMS has not rewarded our progressive thinking, and even though cost savings have been demonstrated, CMS has not provided any reimbursement for these services. If you are looking for telemonitoring results, look to home care and see what we have accomplished. Thanks, Gwen Toney

Gwen Toney

Vice President of Govt Affairs
Ohio Home Care Organization, Ohio Hospice & Palliative Care Organization

 

Posted by: Gwen Toney
8/26/2008

 

I would like to also suggest hospital/physician referral's to Skilled Nursing Facilities. Many people still have the idea that a "Nursing Home" is the end of the road of life, however this is no. Most SNF's can handle much higher levels of care post-acute and most offer wonderful rehab programs and all disciplines (PT, ST, OT). It would be nice to develop a "circle" of care. From Hospital to SNF and then home with home health. This would really help deter the emergency room visits and the costs asscoiated with such visits. Also, a way to educate about the Medicare 30 day window, post hospital stay, for patients and the hospital staff would be very beneficial. Most of the hospital case managers and ER staff are not aware of this benefit.

Robin Davis

Director of Admissions & Marketing
Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center

 

Posted by: Robin Davis
10/1/2008

 

I am in agreement with Ms. Toney and Ms. Davis regarding the positive impact that home health and skilled nursing facility can have on managing the patient after discharge. Unfortunately, I believe that the discharge planning process to sub-acute care settings and home health are very random and disjointed with the sole purpose of getting the patient out of an acute care setting as soon as possible. The discharge planning process needs evidence-based tools/technology (which are available)to determine the functional capability of a patient so as to determine which setting home health or skilled nursing facility will provide best setting for the patient to improve their function and lower the risk for a readmission. The difference in post-acute is that we are dealing with improving the function not diagnosis. I agree with Ms. Davis that a post-acute care/home health continuum of care needs to be implemented consistently and monitored in both settings on evidence-based cases. There are a few health plans that have saved millions of dollars by developing post-acute care utilization management processes yet have improved the overall quality of care for the patient. They are now moving toward integrating the home health component to determine which setting would be the most appropriate to improve the patient's function. Unfortunately, many health plans have not thus have very high readmission rates, inappropriate SNF admissions, wide practice variations for the same hip fracture, and no ability to monitor outcomes or utilization in either a SNF setting or home health. If you can determine the function and risks of the discharged patient then you are not going to be able to control readmissions no matter what kind of telemedicine program you have in place. I have always believed in the principal of K.I.S.S.

Michael Sandwith

Vice President of Sales
SeniorMetrix, Inc.

 

Posted by: Michael Sandwith
10/2/2008

 

Any kind of telephone follow up would be an improvement on the current situation.

Usually, when you leave the healthcare provider, presciption in hand , you are done. That is, until your symptoms become so extreme that you have to pick up the phone again or the ambulance comes to carry you away.

I myself had an extensive range of checks for insurance reasons a year ago, got a prescription from a neurologist for an "essential tremor", and have heard nothing since. It is possible to conceive that a secretary could have called to ask whether I had been taking the meds, whether they were working, whether I had any side-effects, whether it had helped, etc. Instead nothing. I fully expect better service from the company that is going to lay carpet in my bedroom next week. I am sure they will call to check that I am satisfied.

Connected health is not necessarily some massive technological extravagansa. It means being connected - patient and caregiver. Let us keep it simple in the first instance - do some follow up.

Chris Johnson

VP Business Development
Cypak

 

Posted by: Chris Johnson
10/3/2008

 

Thank you to each of you for your thoughtful replies. I absolutely agree with each of you. There is clearly a vital role for the visiting nurse in caring for our sickest patients. SNF and Rehab facilities are also an essential part of the continuum of care. However, as you know, many very sick or complicated patients are still not homebound, and do not qualify for VNA services. I see connected health as one way to fill this gap.
Mr. Sandwith and Mr. Johnson both highlight the dangers patients face in periods of transition, e.g. hospital or SNF to home. Research from Kaiser found that >90% of hospital discharge medication lists contained errors (such as duplicative medication classes, interactions, inappropriate dosing). Patients often feel, and sometimes are, abandoned. Economic incentives to discharge early mean that patients are frequently sent home while they are still fairly ill. So, yes, we need to embrace the patient and guide them through the entire continuum of their care. Thinking creatively about how to make this happen seamlessly, in a way that is cost effective and easy for the patient, is essential. Determining the best location for the patient is one important step in this process. At some point, though, we hope to get everyone back into their home, and it is at this point that connected health can fill an important care gap.

Allison McDonough

Medical Director, Chronic Care Management
Partners

 

Posted by: Allison McDonough
10/8/2008

 

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

LifeCOMM: Will the Newest Personal Health Information Platform Play Nicely with Google and Microsoft?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | Vince Kuraitis
The Financial Meltdown: Implications for Connected Health
Friday, October 17, 2008 | Thomas H. Lee, MD  | 7 Comments
The Art and Science of Inspiring Quality in Clinical Medicine
Friday, September 26, 2008 | Jeff Gruen, MD, MBA  | 2 Comments
Connected Health: Expanding its Role to Prevent 30-day Hospital Readmissions
Friday, August 22, 2008 | Allison McDonough, MD  | 5 Comments
Solving the Puzzle of Poor Adherence – Can Connected Health Tools Provide the Missing Pieces?
Thursday, July 24, 2008 | Shanta Griffin, PhD and Alice Watson, MD, MPH  | 7 Comments
Can Connected Health survive the political economy of health care?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | Matthew Holt  | 3 Comments
Connected Health and the Medical Home: Savior or Distraction?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 6 Comments
Connected Health in the Developing World
Monday, March 24, 2008 | Paul Heinzelmann  | 15 Comments
Can Second Life serve as a virtual training ground for individuals with poor social skills?
Monday, February 25, 2008 | Dr. Jerome Schultz  | 9 Comments
How Reliable is Reliable in Connected Health?
Monday, January 21, 2008 | Doug McClure  | 9 Comments
Self-Insured Companies: Low-Hanging Fruit for Consumer-Driven Telehealth?
Monday, November 26, 2007 | Malcolm Burwell  | 3 Comments
What Will Microsoft's HealthVault Mean to the Telehealth Community?
Thursday, October 18, 2007 | Vince Kuraitis and Tim Gee  | 5 Comments
Causing What Isn’t
Monday, August 20, 2007 | Joseph Kvedar  | 2 Comments
Revolutionizing Healthcare
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 | Jeff Gruen  | 6 Comments
Personal Health Management
Monday, May 21, 2007 | Joseph Ternullo  | 3 Comments
Medical Education of the Future?
Friday, April 27, 2007 | Ramesh Ramloll  | 2 Comments
Using Telemedicine to Create Intimacy
Monday, April 9, 2007 | Jon Darsee  | 12 Comments
Can we use Web 2.0 in Health Care?
Friday, December 8, 2006 | Sally Lakeman  | 10 Comments
The Changing Care Provider
Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Ateret Haselkorn  | 4 Comments
A Metric for Connected Health Success?
Friday, October 6, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 9 Comments
Impediments to Technology Adoption
Monday, September 25, 2006 | Neil Wasserman  | 5 Comments
Behavioral Telehealth
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 | Steven Locke  | 5 Comments
Will MediPare Come to Pass?
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 | Ashok Boghani  | 14 Comments
A Home Care Perspective
Friday, May 5, 2006 | Kathy Duckett  | 4 Comments
The True Burden of Connected Health?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | Ravi Nemana  | 7 Comments
The Future of the Hospital
Friday, March 17, 2006 | Joseph Coughlin  | 6 Comments
The Role of Consumer Grade Techologies
Sunday, January 8, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 7 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go