A Home Care Perspective

Friday, May 5, 2006  | Kathy Duckett


Are physicians going to see telemedicine as an extension of their ability to serve their patients, or an incursion into their locus of control (including reimbursement)?

Over the last 50 years we have increasingly required the patient “go somewhere” to get the medical care needed.  Except in home care.  We started 150 years ago by bringing health care to the patient.  Very little has changed in that basic concept; we still provide all of our care in the patient’s home.  Telemedicine’s increasing emphasis is on bringing health care to the patient instead bringing the patient to health care.  As a home care provider I find myself concerned that some of the challenges we’ve met in the medical community will be translated to the implementation of this new technology. 

Over the years I’ve found many physicians who embrace the benefits that home care can provide.  I’ve felt honored and privileged to work with physicians who have seen me as providing patient insight in a way that is unavailable to them due to my unique perspective: caring for the patient in the “real world” of that patient’s home. 

However, I have also met a number of physicians who complained about the uncompensated time spent in coordinating care when a patient has had home care, and the lack of control over the care provided.  They found burdensome the demands I put on them to return my phone calls and make decisions on the patient’s care based on my assessments.  They were quite verbal about the amount of paperwork they had to complete for me and the time consumed completing the paperwork for Medicare in order to get paid for that time.

As we’ve rolled out telemedicine to our patients every physician I have spoken with has understood how this will help us better manage the patient’s condition.  But we have found physicians slow to respond with parameters to guide our decisions on when to call them.  Physicians are also concerned about the potential paperwork increase and their time commitment in the implementation of this new technology. 

So this is my concern: as telemedicine moves care farther and farther away from the physician’s “hands” will the people who really have the ability to decide yes or no be willing to say “yes” for their patients?

 

Member Comments


Kathy:

Thanks for your thoughts. I hope we might get you to expand on them over at HealthNex

Jack Mason

IBM Strategic Communications, Healthcare
IBM

Focused on IBM's Patient-Centric Care Initiative, producer of IBM's group blog on healthcare transformation, HealthNex (http://www.healthnex.org

 

Posted by: Jack Mason
5/10/2006

 

Kathy, your reflections and questions are right on point.

Having been watching the tide for a long time, I'm beginning to see the direction change. Physicians are showing new openness 1)to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) 2)to care for patients in their homes and communities.

A recent position paper from the American College of Physicians (representing Internists)was an "aha" experience for me! This is must reading -- The Advanced Medical Home: A Patient-Centered, Physician-Guided Model of Health Care, http://www.acponline.org/hpp/adv_med.pdf .

"key elements of a revised reimbursement system should include compensation for: a) the coordination of care both within a given practice and between consultants, ancillary providers and community; b) adoption and use of health information technology for quality improvement; c) provision of enhanced communication access such as secure email and telephone consultation; d) remote monitoring of clinical data using technology; and e) pay-for-reporting/pay-for performance." (p. 6)

Two other comments here: 1) the report is fairly clear that this new openness is motivated by economic realities -- pressures on primary care, physicians choosing to become specialists, the need for fundamental change in physician reimbursement -- rather than unpressured insight that use of ICT is the right thing for patients and an inevitable change of tidal flow, 2) that's perfectly OK by me -- let's applaud the ACP's new direction!

Vince Kuraitis

Principal
Better Health Technologies, LLC

Since 1997 Vince has worked as founder and Principal of Better Health Technologies, LLC (www.bhtinfo.com), a strategy and business development consulting company. BHT creates value for patients and shareholders by leveraging technology, business models and partnerships in areas relating to e-health and chronic disease management. BHT’s clients include both established organizations and early-stage companies. Established organizations include: Samsung Electronics (Global Research Group, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Digital Solution Center), Intel Digital Health Group, Siemens Medical Solutions, Joslin Diabetes Center, Honeywell HomMed, Medtronic (Cardiac Rhythm Patient Management, Neuro Disease Management), HealthPost, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Varian Medical Systems, Disease Management Association of America, PCS Health Systems, VRI, Washoe Health System, S2 Systems, CorpHealth and Centocor. Early-stage companies include Fitsense Technology, Haelan Group, Cardiobeat, EZWeb, Sensitron, Stress Less, Medical Peace, Life Navigator, DiabetesManager.com, CogniMed, Caresoft, Benchmark Oncology, eCare Technologies, Click4Care, and SOS Wireless.

 

Posted by: Vince Kuraitis
5/27/2006

 

Thanks Vince for your comments and for the reference to the ACP article. It certainly bodes well for a climate of ongoing collaboration between all clinical practices to improve patient care delivery. As we all age our current system of silo delivery requiring the physcian to carry the entire burden of care management will certainly become overwhelmed by the volume of baby boomers in the system. Add in the sky-rocketing costs of health care and we are looking at a system in a slow slide downward unless we fundamentally alter our perceptions and practice. It is great to hear that, for whatever reason, physicians are opening up to alternative methods of care delivery outside of our "practice as usual" methodology.
Kathy

Kathy Duckett

Director of Clinical Programs
Partners Home Care

Kathy Duckett has more than 20 years experience all aspects of home care, starting as a home health care nurse to nursing supervisor, Area Director of Clinical Services for Los Angeles county, Regional Director to her current position with Partners Home Care in specialty clinical program development. In addition, Kathy won the 2004 Best How To article from the American Association of Health Care Editors and has authored numeous articles for nurses, physicians, and patients.

 

Posted by: Kathy Duckett
5/31/2006

 

Jack,
I tried to figure out how to log on to make comments on healthnex.com, but couldn't figure out how to do that. Could you help me?
Thanks,
Kathy

Kathy Duckett

Director of Clinical Programs
Partners Home Care

Kathy Duckett has more than 20 years experience all aspects of home care, starting as a home health care nurse to nursing supervisor, Area Director of Clinical Services for Los Angeles county, Regional Director to her current position with Partners Home Care in specialty clinical program development. In addition, Kathy won the 2004 Best How To article from the American Association of Health Care Editors and has authored numeous articles for nurses, physicians, and patients.

 

Posted by: Kathy Duckett
5/31/2006

 

Your Comments


This feature is available for Connected Health members only. Please login now or register to continue.

Login

Discussion

Can Connected Health survive the political economy of health care?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 | Matthew Holt  | 2 Comments
Connected Health and the Medical Home: Savior or Distraction?
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | Joseph Kvedar, MD  | 6 Comments
Connected Health in the Developing World
Monday, March 24, 2008 | Paul Heinzelmann  | 15 Comments
Can Second Life serve as a virtual training ground for individuals with poor social skills?
Monday, February 25, 2008 | Dr. Jerome Schultz  | 7 Comments
How Reliable is Reliable in Connected Health?
Monday, January 21, 2008 | Doug McClure  | 9 Comments
Self-Insured Companies: Low-Hanging Fruit for Consumer-Driven Telehealth?
Monday, November 26, 2007 | Malcolm Burwell  | 3 Comments
What Will Microsoft's HealthVault Mean to the Telehealth Community?
Thursday, October 18, 2007 | Vince Kuraitis and Tim Gee  | 5 Comments
Causing What Isn’t
Monday, August 20, 2007 | Joseph Kvedar  | 2 Comments
Revolutionizing Healthcare
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 | Jeff Gruen  | 6 Comments
Personal Health Management
Monday, May 21, 2007 | Joseph Ternullo  | 3 Comments
Medical Education of the Future?
Friday, April 27, 2007 | Ramesh Ramloll  | 2 Comments
Using Telemedicine to Create Intimacy
Monday, April 9, 2007 | Jon Darsee  | 12 Comments
Can we use Web 2.0 in Health Care?
Friday, December 8, 2006 | Sally Lakeman  | 10 Comments
The Changing Care Provider
Wednesday, October 11, 2006 | Ateret Haselkorn  | 4 Comments
A Metric for Connected Health Success?
Friday, October 6, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 9 Comments
Impediments to Technology Adoption
Monday, September 25, 2006 | Neil Wasserman  | 3 Comments
Behavioral Telehealth
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 | Steven Locke  | 5 Comments
Will MediPare Come to Pass?
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 | Ashok Boghani  | 14 Comments
A Home Care Perspective
Friday, May 5, 2006 | Kathy Duckett  | 4 Comments
The True Burden of Connected Health?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | Ravi Nemana  | 7 Comments
The Future of the Hospital
Friday, March 17, 2006 | Joseph Coughlin  | 6 Comments
The Role of Consumer Grade Techologies
Sunday, January 8, 2006 | Joseph Kvedar  | 7 Comments
 
 

Newsletter Signup

Go